Bear's Film Journal

Words and images with a focus on cinema.

La Luna (Bernardo Bertolucci, 1979)

Coming in around the middle of Bertolucci’s career, La Luna feels almost like a caricature of his greatest films. Once again he tries to push the boundaries of taboo and erotica, but unlike Last Tango in Paris, this attempt was not nearly as successful or well received. It just isn’t as whole of a film and as a result it often feels as if some key element is missing. There is so much build-up, but so little payoff, and both the drama and conflict feel contained and exploited. Perhaps in trying to push audiences even further, Bertolucci was forcing too much out of his work, and ended up turning it over on itself, with bland oddness and overlong moments of emptiness. It is frustrating to think that he may have approached this film with less than the best in artistic intentions. However, that does not mean La Luna isn’t delicately polished with lush mise-en-scène, which Bertolucci has always been more than proficient at. Unfortunately, it is just not nearly enough to overcome the tired shock value of the story, or the uninspiring flatness of the main characters, despite their excellent performances.

Sweetly, the film does have an almost epic quality which I was able to, at times, get lost in. This is brought about by the sinuous camera, sexual undercurrents and prominent use of opera, which heighten the experience considerably above simple depravity and exploitation. There are multiple themes laden across La Luna, the most prominent of which being the incestuous relationship between mother and son. As if this wasn’t enough to work with on its own, there is also a bout with heroin addiction and the search for a father figure. It is heavy, no doubt about it, but it does not go far enough into the characters, or even far enough outside of them, to reward so much transgression. Perhaps there was just too much involvement needed that I wasn’t able to find, so I ended up feeling distanced when I should have felt embraced and affected.

Amarcord (Federico Fellini, 1973)

Fellini was a firm believer that all art is inherently autobiographical, and as far as Amarcord goes, it is best to take this literally. Quite possibly his most personal film, which is saying a lot, it revisits and recreates his home town of Rimini in the 1930s, but not without adding a purely fantastical zest to the characters and situations. Fellini’s intimacy shines through brighter than any individual performance or scene, and he is able to analyse both the social and the political together, without pretence or cynicism. At its simplest, Amarcord is a coming-of-age story about a young boy named Titta. At its most complex, it is a uniquely structured tale of a town and its people, told serenely and effortlessly by a director who didn’t have to think to create, but only to feel.

By being at times so shamelessly vulgar and humorous, the film awards itself an ease of watchability which is then rewarded during inspired moments of realisation and beauty. There is so much contrast and variety present that it sends our emotions flying haphazardly from one sequence to the next, and always in a fresh and exuberant manner. Because Amarcord does not follow a consistent protagonist, not even Titta, the town instead becomes the natural subject of our gaze and contemplation, which is an almost jarring sensation, and one which doesn’t tie together fully without later reflection and overview. There are multiple narrators who each work in vastly different ways, working to enlighten us and bring us closer to the world Fellini envisioned. They speak to us, inform us, and let us in on the spectacle, the carnival of life. Amarcord is an enhanced memory of a time and period in Fellini’s life which he remembers with honesty and fanciful splendour. We are just lucky that he is able to communicate his wild imagination so efficiently, and with such tangible rhythm and poignancy.